Add async simulcast support to VideoProcessor.
For the buffering of |input_frames_|, we assume that frames are ordered per simulcast layer but we make no assumptions between layers. For SVC, we still assume ordering of encode callbacks for the spatial layers. If we ever add async codecs that support SVC, they should still obey this assumption. Bug: webrtc:8448 Change-Id: I4ebb0c1e1d0eef41d850ed5b92aacc79d0a11137 Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/60801 Commit-Queue: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org> Reviewed-by: Sergey Silkin <ssilkin@webrtc.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#22380}
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Commit Bot
parent
0fdb317b67
commit
0f1c0bd326
@ -119,10 +119,6 @@ void TestConfig::SetCodecSettings(VideoCodecType codec_type,
|
||||
// Spatial scalability is only available with VP9.
|
||||
RTC_CHECK(num_spatial_layers < 2 || codec_type == kVideoCodecVP9);
|
||||
|
||||
// Simulcast/SVC is only supposed to work with software codecs.
|
||||
RTC_CHECK((!hw_encoder && !hw_decoder) ||
|
||||
(num_simulcast_streams == 1 && num_spatial_layers == 1));
|
||||
|
||||
// Some base code requires numberOfSimulcastStreams to be set to zero
|
||||
// when simulcast is not used.
|
||||
codec_settings.numberOfSimulcastStreams =
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user