With this change, RTCVideoEncoder can specify:
- requested_resolution_alignment,
- apply_alignment_to_all_simulcast_layers
in the same way scaling_settings is specified.
Change-Id: I3de79a2eabaae581d6a9f2ef3e39496b9545a4f5
Bug: webrtc:12829
Change-Id: I3de79a2eabaae581d6a9f2ef3e39496b9545a4f5
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220933
Reviewed-by: Kári Helgason <kthelgason@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Åsa Persson <asapersson@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Abby Yeh <abbyyeh@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Hanspers <peterhanspers@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34196}
Enumerating windows owned by the current process on Windows has some
complications due to the GetWindowText*() APIs potentially causing a
deadlock. The APIs will send messages to the window's message loop, and
if the message loop is waiting on this operation we will enter a
deadlock.
I previously put in a mitigation for this [1] which brought the
incidence rate down by an order of magnitude, but we are still seeing
this issue fairly frequently.
So, I've added DesktopCaptureOption enumerate_current_process_windows
which allows consumers to avoid this issue completely by ignoring
these potentially problematic windows.
By default the flag is set to true which equates with the current
behavior, consumers can set the flag to false to get the new behavior.
I've also updated all the capturers that enumerate windows on Windows
to respect the option.
[1] https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/195365
Bug: chromium:1152841
Change-Id: I0e0d868957d6fbe1e607a440b3a909d005c93ccf
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219380
Commit-Queue: Austin Orion <auorion@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Downing <joedow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34191}
The way that the "next stream" was picked when round-robin cycling was
flawed. When a message was produced in its entirety, the "next stream"
would be put at a stream identifier value that was just larger than what
was previously used. And then, for each fragment that was to be created,
it would try to resolve the nearest stream (above or equal to that
number) that had messages to send - always starting from that stream id
that didn't necessarily point to the stream for which fragments were
actually produced.
For example, if the previous stream ID for which a message was fully
produced on was 5, then the next_stream_id would be set to 6, and then
when producing next fragment, it might have produced something from
stream_id=1, because that was the only stream with messages in it. It
wouldn't update next_stream_id at this time; it would still be 6.
After a single fragment had been produced from that stream, a message
was queued on stream_id=6. The next time a fragment was to be produced,
it would not continue one stream_id=1, but instead pick the new stream,
which would suddenly produce a new fragment (with B flag set) while the
previous message (from stream_id=1) wasn't finished yet.
The fix is simple; Just ensure that we continue iterating from where we
ever produce a fragment from.
Bug: webrtc:12832
Change-Id: Icc761c572ed200db607a7609dab1ac6a8aeb2f04
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220938
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34190}
This variable is not used, always set to false but complicates
things for `keyframe_generation_requested_` as setting keyframe_needed
requires keyframe_generation_requested_ to be read synchronously from
what soon will be a different thread than where SetAndGetRecordingState
is called on.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I25675d9b70c9ec96a2542e7cf5480c835ea984eb
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220840
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34188}
Call send statistic updates are initiated on the send
transport sequence which forced calls to PostTask to the
worker thread which keeps several related attributes
protected by it.
Change this by:
* Using std::atomics for three attributes where synchronization
doesn't really matter and which can be accessed on either
context.
* Introducing a thread-compatible internal class which keeps
the statistics protected by the send transport sequence, and
emits UMA statistics on destruction.
The change also achieves the following trivial changes:
* The call origin time is now tracked by a proper
webrtc::Timestamp.
* The explicit use of the |send_transport_queue_| was replaced by
a more relaxed sequence checker.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I428a4d98b5fd2fd31222f62e597a9d61a3d4899f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220931
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34187}
The 'worker' noun in WebRTC is tied to the worker thread.
Hence naming an unrelated queue to something with worker
confuses code reading.
Change this to something which can't reasonably be confused
with the worker thread.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: Icdcc728cf3dd9eb020f922367eebd0c520814568
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220934
Reviewed-by: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34183}
Both flexfec and AV1 seem not to have created interop issues and falling
back to the lower range is better than skipping the codecs.
BUG=webrtc:12295
Change-Id: I58459133beae4f17b767af92a4e2c9028ab8cbe3
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/217888
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@nvidia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34182}
This way we can have custom implementation of RtpTransportControllerSendInterface and pass it properly to Call.
Call relies on RtpTransportControllerSendInterface already so this is natural way to customize RTP related classes.
If there is custom factory present in dependencies it will be used, otherwise default factory will be used.
Intention behind this change is to have ability to have custom QoS with custom parameters.
Bug: webrtc:12778
Change-Id: I5b88957025621ef4bcd63eaa98c218ad213da9c8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/217769
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@nvidia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34181}
Before this CL, before sending out any chunk, all inflight data chunks
were inspected to find out if they were supposed to be retransmitted.
When the congestion window is large, this is a lot of data chunks to
inspect, which takes time.
By having a separate collection for chunks to be retransmitted, this
becomes a much faster operation. In most cases, constant in time.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I0d43ba7a88656eead26d5e0b9c4735622a8d080e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219626
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34178}
There is no need to iterate through all outstanding data chunks to know
if a FORWARD-TSN can be sent. As the FORWARD-TSN will just move the
cumulative TSN ack, if a chunk is found that is not to be expired,
there is no need to continue any further. This makes it much faster
to know if to send a FORWARD-TSN when the congestion window is large.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I58bce408ae9814c8d3d7bbb480b0037a2cf88dd7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219625
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34176}
Specifying guards for functions and member variables. Also updating
a few places for VideoReceiveStream2 accordingly.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I2d13b009ec9853c6b2d90b08af555ecdd2b1ced6
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220765
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34174}
Before this CL, a SACK was generated from scratch based on information
about each received fragment, to generate correct gap-ack-blocks.
When there was a lot of data in the data tracker (due to packet loss),
this took considerate time, as generating a SACK was O(N), where N is
the amount of fragments in the data tracker.
By instead having precomputed gap-ack-blocks that are continuously
updated, generating a SACK is much faster and the memory usage goes down
a bit as well.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I924752c1d6d31f06d27246e10b595e9ccb19320f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220763
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34171}
There limit that decides if an incoming TSN should be accepted or not
was decided based on very small transfers with no packet loss. But in
simulations where a socket tries to send a lot of data and when there
is moderate packet loss, the number of tracker data chunks on the
receive side will be considerably higher than what the limit was.
Set the limit to allow high data rate also on moderate packet loss.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: I6ca237e5609d8b511e9b10c919da33dca7420c01
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220761
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34169}
The receive buffer mustn't be full; If it's full, and a message can't be
assembled, the socket can't accept more data. To avoid this, there is
a high watermark limit that, when reached, will make the socket only
accept chunks that advance the cumulative ack TSN.
Before this CL, the announced receiver window size in every sent SACK
was based on what the receive buffer could maximally be, which means
that in really high data rate applications, the amount of outstanding
data could actually fill the receive buffer (due to packet loss, that
prevents messages from being reassembled). As the socket started
behaving more conservatively when the high watermark limit was reached,
this resulted in unnecessary T3-RTXes. But by announcing the high
watermark limit instead, the sender will stay within it, and will have
a peer socket that behaves as expected.
Bug: webrtc:12799
Change-Id: Ife2f409914a230640217553c54f60d05843efc70
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220762
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34168}
Starting new audio codecs from the top of the lower range
reduces collisions with video codecs which are assigned from
the bottom of the lower range
BUG=webrtc:11640
Change-Id: If6d2b849b8e1de777a1d4352df533e4f1845fde9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220022
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34166}
There were some missing unit tests that are now written. When doing
this, it was found that SACKs weren't sent for duplicate received
chunks, which they should be according to the spec.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: I8296473c0c8cbaf0329785de95e9b9945f254339
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220607
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34165}
This is useful in tests and in scenarios where the connection is
monitored externally and the heartbeat monitoring would be of no use.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ida4f4e2e40fc4d2aa0c27ae9431f434da4cc8313
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220766
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34164}
This is in preparation for actually doing this initialization
differently in the Call class. This CL takes the registration
steps that are inherently network thread associated and makes
them separate from the ctor/dtor.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: Ice2e16c108e0c302157534a3aa2b46738aaa7a93
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220608
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34163}
This is part of moving the thread hops from the network thread to
worker (required by Call) into Call itself so that we can eventually
remove them.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: Ib3ccdd6c75a3848daae2e3ce6c9a55d9617c2f50
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220604
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34160}
Increases readability of configuration setup by separating
first time configuration setup and reconfiguration.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ifee29c31bce505a971ab5993cb862a72db94725a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220700
Reviewed-by: Henrik Andreassson <henrika@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34159}
This change collects the receive stats that Call
maintains into a new thread-compatible
internal class which can easily be switched to
the network thread.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I9fa9a7f057149789aa327e5ba8a8cb3379762272
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220760
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34158}
* Use cgi.escape for Python 2.7 and html.escape for Python 3.
* Modify unittest to succeed in both Python 2.7 and 3.
No-Presubmit: True
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ie711873468145c9abbd12313086ebe7358e20ab7
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220621
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34156}
This is currently unused and since we ultimately don't want the delivery
of packets to be async at this stage (but rather stay on the network
thread), we don't need it.
Bug: webrtc:11993
Change-Id: I6809026b6901c8ecfacd961e98ddf79aaa16d0bd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/220601
Reviewed-by: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34152}
This change creates trace events with a single parameter
composed of ClassName::Method.
The change additionally causes the duration of the proxy call to be
traced, not only the occurrence.
Fixed: webrtc:12787
Change-Id: I1689862318d4c6fc1dcef343c3ccf3ae9f7e17df
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219788
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34149}
