There's no real notion of VideoEngine left in these classes. They're
end-to-end tests built on Call, so CallTest makes more sense.
This also contains a modification to RtpRtcpObserver moving the
responsibility of creating the event that signals when the observation
is complete to RtpRtcpObserver. New tests are about to be introduced and
this will reduce code duplication.
BUG=
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2258005
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4793 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Implements the ExternalVideoDecoder interface for VideoReceiveStream.
Also adds a FakeDecoder used in tests, removing the overhead of running
the EngineTest tests with VP8 under Memcheck/TSan, allowing us to enable
them under Memcheck/TSan as well.
BUG=2346,2312
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2172004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4702 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Adds AllowCommandLineParsing to allow us to ignore "--no-sandbox" given
by new TSanV2 bots. Not ignoring this flag prevents the test from
running on this machine. Also removing unnecessary asserts that clutter
code.
BUG=
TEST=Locally running video_engine_tests with --no-sandbox.
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2178004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4679 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Breaks out config part of FakeEncoder from VideoSendStream tests to
FakeEncoder. Also sets FakeEncoder as encoder for VideoSendStream tests.
Anticipated speedup didn't happen as VP8 is still initialized by default
when creating channels in the old API. This will be sped up when moving
off the old API as VP8 won't be enabled by default.
BUG=2312
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2155004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4659 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
This is a re-land attempt of http://review.webrtc.org/1673004/
It now includes a build/isolate.gypi in WebRTC that includes the same
file as the one that would be included when WebRTC is used in a Chromium
checkout. It is needed since it is not possible to use variables in GYP's
includes sections.
Implemented according to the instructions at
http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/isolated-testing
Workflow has been like this:
1. create _run GYP target
2. create a stripped down .isolate file
3. export GYP_DEFINES="$GYP_DEFINES test_isolation_mode=check"
4. runhooks
5. compile
6. test if the test would run (i.e. find it's dependencies) without
actually executing it:
tools/swarm_client/isolate.py run --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
7. If failing, run the fix_test_cases.py script like this:
tools/swarm_client/googletest/fix_test_cases.py --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
All tests that run on the bots for WebRTC has got _run target
and .isolate file created.
"Normal tests" that run fine on any machine:
* audio_decoder_unittests
* common_audio_unittests
* common_video_unittests
* metrics_unittests
* modules_tests
* modules_unittests
* neteq_unittests
* system_wrappers_unittests
* test_support_unittests
* tools_unittests
* video_engine_core_unittests
* voice_engine_unittests
Tests that requires bare-metal and audio/video devices:
* audio_device_tests
* video_capture_tests
I also added the isolate boilerplate code for the following
tests that are not yet pure gtest binaries (which means they
cannot run isolated yet):
* video_render_tests
* vie_auto_test
* voe_auto_test
TEST=running isolate.py as described above. WebRTC trybots passing. Created a Chromium checkout with third_party/webrtc ToT and this patch applied, passing the runhooks step.
BUG=1916
R=henrike@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2056004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4590 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
As this breaks the FYI bots in
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webrtc.fyi/waterfall
due to different path to isolate.gypi (which cannot easily
be resolved due to limitations in GYP)
> Isolate GYP target and .isolate files for tests
>
> Implemented according to the instructions at
> http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/isolated-testing
>
> Workflow has been like this:
> 1. create _run GYP target
> 2. create a stripped down .isolate file
> 3. export GYP_DEFINES="$GYP_DEFINES test_isolation_mode=check"
> 4. runhooks
> 5. compile
> 6. test if the test would run (i.e. find it's dependencies) without
> actually executing it:
> tools/swarm_client/isolate.py run --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
> 7. If failing, run the fix_test_cases.py script like this:
> tools/swarm_client/fix_test_cases.py --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
>
> All tests that run on the bots for WebRTC has got _run target
> and .isolate file created.
>
> "Normal tests" that run fine on any machine:
> * audio_decoder_unittests
> * common_audio_unittests
> * common_video_unittests
> * metrics_unittests
> * modules_integrationtests
> * modules_unittests
> * neteq_unittests
> * system_wrappers_unittests
> * test_support_unittests
> * tools_unittests
> * video_engine_core_unittests
> * voice_engine_unittests
>
> Tests that requires bare-metal and audio/video devices:
> * audio_device_integrationtests
> * video_capture_integrationtests
>
> I also added the isolate boilerplate code for the following
> tests that are not yet pure gtest binaries (which means they
> cannot run isolated yet):
> * video_render_integrationtests
> * vie_auto_test
> * voe_auto_test
>
> TEST=running isolate.py as described above.
> BUG=1916
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
>
> Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/1673004TBR=kjellander@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2040004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4548 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Implemented according to the instructions at
http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/isolated-testing
Workflow has been like this:
1. create _run GYP target
2. create a stripped down .isolate file
3. export GYP_DEFINES="$GYP_DEFINES test_isolation_mode=check"
4. runhooks
5. compile
6. test if the test would run (i.e. find it's dependencies) without
actually executing it:
tools/swarm_client/isolate.py run --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
7. If failing, run the fix_test_cases.py script like this:
tools/swarm_client/fix_test_cases.py --isolated out/Release/testname.isolated
All tests that run on the bots for WebRTC has got _run target
and .isolate file created.
"Normal tests" that run fine on any machine:
* audio_decoder_unittests
* common_audio_unittests
* common_video_unittests
* metrics_unittests
* modules_integrationtests
* modules_unittests
* neteq_unittests
* system_wrappers_unittests
* test_support_unittests
* tools_unittests
* video_engine_core_unittests
* voice_engine_unittests
Tests that requires bare-metal and audio/video devices:
* audio_device_integrationtests
* video_capture_integrationtests
I also added the isolate boilerplate code for the following
tests that are not yet pure gtest binaries (which means they
cannot run isolated yet):
* video_render_integrationtests
* vie_auto_test
* voe_auto_test
TEST=running isolate.py as described above.
BUG=1916
R=tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/1673004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4547 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Running with a network thread provides a more realistic simulation. Like
a real network, packets are handed off to a socket, or buffer, and then
the call returns. This prevents weird scenarios when both the sending
side and receiving side are on the call stack simultaneously, which can
cause deadlocks as locks could otherwise be taken simultaneously in both
the sender and receiver order by the same thread.
BUG=
R=stefan@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/2000005
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@4522 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
